by Jodie Renner, editor and author
How do you express thoughts and inner reactions in fiction? Thoughts, like dialogue, need to drive the story forward and be natural-sounding and appropriate for both the “thinker” and the situation.
For this article, I’ve purposely used the term “thought-reactions,” instead of just “thoughts,” as in fiction, in any given scene, we’re in someone’s point of view, so in their head, privy to their thoughts. In that sense, all the narration for that scene is or should be in their thoughts, written in ordinary font, with no special punctuation or thought tags. For example, in Sandra Brown’s Ricochet, we’re in Duncan’s point of view. We read: “Within seconds Jenny appeared. All six feet of her, most of it sleek, tanned legs that looked like they’d been airbrushed to perfection.” This is obviously Duncan’s viewpoint and his opinion/thoughts. No need to say “he thought.”
Thought-reactions, on the other hand, are when that viewpoint character (and only the POV character – we shouldn’t know the thoughts of anyone else in that scene) has an inner, emotional reaction to something that has just happened, or something someone has just said or done, whether it be anger, delight, confusion, frustration, surprise, or whatever. Or perhaps they’re actively planning something.
In popular fiction written in third-person (he, she, they) past tense, you’ll see thoughts or thought-reactions appearing in either present or past tense, in first-person (I), second-person (you), or third-person (he, she, they).
Indirect introspection or indirect thoughts summarize or paraphrase the thinker's
words. Indirect thoughts are usually expressed in
third-person, past tense and written in normal font (avoid italics for indirect
thoughts), with or without thought tags, like “she thought” or “he thought.”
This is the equivalent to reporting what somebody said, rather than using their
exact words in quotation marks, only of course these words are not spoken.
-
She wondered if he’d be late
again. - Why couldn’t she understand where he was coming from?
- If he didn’t know better, he would swear she was genuinely perplexed.
Direct introspection or direct thoughts use the character’s exact (unspoken) words,
normally expressed in first-person, present tense. They
can be in normal font or in italics. This is the equivalent to dialogue in
quotation marks, except the words aren’t spoken out loud.
-
Why doesn’t she get it?
-
I’d better call Mom today.
-
Where’s that phone number?
Putting direct
thoughts in italics can be very effective for expressing a sudden strong emotional
reaction. Showing these visceral reactions of your characters helps us get
inside their heads and hearts more deeply and bond with them more. Showing a
thought-reaction in italics works best when used sparingly, for a significant
or urgent thought or reaction:
Rats!
Omigod!
Leave out the thought
tag, as the italics signify a direct thought, in this case.
Examples:
Here are some examples of indirect thoughts contrasted with the same thought expressed directly.
Here are some examples of indirect thoughts contrasted with the same thought expressed directly.
Indirect: She felt lucky.
Direct: Lucky
me!
Indirect: He was such an idiot.
Direct: What an idiot! Or,
in second person: You idiot!
Indirect: She had to be kidding.
Direct: What? You’ve got to be
kidding! (second person)
Indirect: Did she really think he’d believe that?
Direct: Give me a break!
Indirect: She opened the curtains. It was a gorgeous day.
Direct: She opened the curtains. What a gorgeous day.
Indirect: Jake took a step back, wondering what he’d done.
Direct:
Jake took a step back. Holy crap. What
have I done?Here’s an example from Don’t Look Twice, by Andrew Gross:
It was already after
ten! She tried David’s cell one more time. Again, his voice mail came on.
What
the hell is going on, David?
She started to get
worried….
No-nos:
Finally, here are three basic no-nos for expressing thoughts or thought reactions in fiction:
-
Never use quotation marks
around thoughts. Quotation marks designate spoken words.
-
Never say “he thought to
himself” or “she thought to herself.” That’s a sign of amateurish writing—who
else would they be thinking to?
-
Don’t have your characters
think in perfect, grammatically correct, complex sentences. It’s just not
realistic. Many of our thoughts are emotional reactions, flashes or images,
expressed through a few well-chosen words.
Jodie Renner is a freelance fiction editor and the award-winning author of three craft-of-writing guides in her series An Editor’s Guide to Writing Compelling Fiction: FIRE UP YOUR FICTION, CAPTIVATE YOUR READERS, and WRITING A KILLER THRILLER, as well as two clickable time-saving e-resources, QUICK CLICKS: Spelling List and QUICK CLICKS: Word Usage. She has also organized two anthologies for charity: VOICES FROM THE VALLEYS – Stories and Poems about Life in BC’s Interior, and CHILDHOOD REGAINED – Stories of Hope for Asian Child Workers. Jodie lives in Kelowna, BC, Canada. Website: www.JodieRenner.com; Facebook. Amazon Author Page.
I printed this out to keep handy during my rewrite. Great reminders!
ReplyDeleteJodie, I've got a question about applying your excellent advice to my first-person novel.
ReplyDeleteI've italicized the brief thoughts that are expressed as direct quotes by the FP character and by her dead mother (in the FP character's imagination). They're worded in such a way that the reader can easily identify who's "speaking." Should I add quotation marks to the mother's imaginary remarks? Seems like overkill to me, but what do you think?
Thanks. Linda
Hi Linda,
ReplyDeleteThanks for stopping by. No, definitely no quotation marks for thoughts or imaginary remarks. Reserve quotation marks for actual dialogue. Good luck with your first-person novel!
Thanks, Jodie.
DeleteI enjoy reading first-person mysteries and it felt natural to write this book in first person too.
It's taking so long to finish a full draft! My nonfiction projects keep hogging my writing time.
Meanwhile, though, I'm soaking up sage counsel from you experienced folks. :)
Glad to be of help, Linda. I look forward to reading your mystery when it's done!
ReplyDeleteThis is very helpful! Thanks.
ReplyDeleteThanks for dropping by, Heather!
ReplyDeleteThanks for clarifying an often murky area!
ReplyDeleteSpeaking of murky areas, what about telepathic communication? An agent objected to my use of italics for it, requesting instead quotation marks for any speech-like conversation, audible or no. This isn't exactly covered in the Chicago Manual...is this usage standard, or does this sound like a "house rule" to you?